review bone-tec
# picture gallery 2011
# awards 2011
# comments 2010
# picture gallery 2010
# awards 2010
# comments 2009
# poster award 2009
# poster award 2008
 
general information
# congress venue
# discover Hannover
# travel / transportation
# hotels
# congress dinner
   
programme 2011
# invited speakers
# scientific programme
   
industry / sponsoring
# sponsors/exhibitors/partner
# general information
# sponsoring packages
# diverse sponsoring
# exhibition opportunities
# industry symposium/lecture
   
 
 
 
Scientific Partner 2011

 

 
EACMFS
 
team themen registration abstract symposia
  Home »
 
     
     
  Criteria for bone-tec 2010 awards  
     
 

The criteria for judging were based on:
a) Scientific Content;
b) Creativity/Novelty and
c) Presentation/Clarity.

 
     
  In order to be objective as possible, the rigorous judging was carried in two rounds by distinguished keynote speakers who have been asked to declare their conflict of interest in the beginning.  
     
  In the first round 4 best oral presenters from a total of 33 oral papers and 10 best posters from a total of 53 posters were selected.
In round two, all the nominees in the 1st round were each given 7 mins for their results presentation and 3 min for Q&A, all in one session setting where more than 10 judges of various expert fields avail themselves to judge the best in each category.
 
     
     
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
               
 

 

   
  © 2011 bone-tec # Imprint # Legal Information # WebDesign